Photoshop’s Limitations with Panoramic Stitching: Use Hugin!

by Miserere


On September 15th, 2009 I went to see the Boston Red Sox play the Los Angeles Angels in Fenway Park, Boston. I knew the game would start shortly after sunset and that my seat would look out towards the West, so I planned to take a panoramic photo of the stadium even if I did nothing else that day. The weather cooperated and even provided some clouds to increase the dramatic effect of the sky at sunset. I also snapped the photos when the sky’s brightness was similar to that of the field; this is a short window of opportunity that cannot be missed!

While I had processed the many photos I took during the game, including the 4 individual photos that I wanted to stitch, I hadn’t actually got around to creating the panorama. I tried doing that this evening using Photoshop’s Photomerge function, but it kept complaining about not being able to align one of the images. This had happened to me on a number of occasions with less important panoramas, and I had simply given up, but I was determined to get this panorama to work. Where can I find a good, free panorama stitching tool? I need look no further than this very blog! Peter Zack keeps a list of freeware image editing tools and software that I recommend everyone bookmark. It was there that I found Hugin, a piece of software that serves as a GUI (Graphical User Interface) to the industry standard panorama creating algorithm Panorama Tools, written by German mathematician Prof. Dr. H. Dersch .

I downloaded the latest version, which installed quickly on my Windows XP laptop, and in very little time I had my panorama. And no, it didn’t complain about any images not being aligned. I wasted a lot of time playing around with different perspectives and other parameters, but in the end the default and automatic settings gave the best result by far. Next time I know not to touch anything and simply press GO. Actually…next time (tomorrow) I will redo this panorama using TIFFs instead of JPEGs. I’m sure it will take longer due to the larger file sizes and bit depth, but the end result will be of higher quality.

But even with JPEGs, the panorama looks pretty damn good to me. Please, judge for yourselves (click for larger version). And if you have any favourite panorama tools, let me know in the comments section!

Miserere - Fenway Park panorama

Fenway Park, home of the Boston Red Sox

Related posts:

  1. Free Image and Photo Editing Software Resources
  2. Taking Panoramas to a New Height

If you enjoyed this article and found it useful, please consider buying us a beverage. Better still, support EtL by making your online purchases through our affiliate stores—it costs you nothing extra and we get a small commission from every item.
Note: Links in this article might be to one of our affiliate stores. Purchases made from our affiliates through these links will benefit Enticing the Light at no extra cost to you.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,



  1. That’s awesome! Thanks also for the info on the software goodies – I’ve been wanting to experiment with digital editing since I’ve come into the 20th century age of photography but just couldn’t see spending the $699 for Adobe for my minimal needs.

  2. Yowsa, that’s a nice pano. The Stanley sign on the right is highly appropriate. I’ve yet to try out my p’shop upgrade properly, but I’d been thinking about trying Hugin too…

  3. I have yet to try out a panorama on digital… I miss the feature that was on my canon point and shoot film camera… where you just slide a little lever into “panorama” and there you go!

  4. I have not tried a pano either. I wonder what a street pano would look like ;-)

  5. That IS nice, Mis! I gotta try that some day. I want you to know that I root for the Sox religiously (but only when they play the Yankees ;~)

  6. That is a great pano. As a result of this post I downloaded Hugin and tried it out on a couple of pano sequences to compare with PS CS3. First off you have to read at least a little bit of the manual to get anywhere. But that isn’t a negative. I found on the first sequence where PS had done a pretty good job that Hugin didn’t do as good a job. It was a street scene where a partial image of a car was rendered in the final result. That may of course be down to my inexperience with the prog. The second sequence was one that had fooled PS because I couldn’t tell PS where to put some of the control points. Hugin did a great job of that one.

    So it’s a keeper. But as PS is so much faster to set up, if not in actual processsing, I will in future try PS first and then Hugin if it fails.

    Thanks for the tip.

  7. Great pic was looking for something like this to frame and put on my wall, could I get a copy of this pic?

  8. The economic development organizations are capable to develop credit fund and so are prepared to risk
    a certain amount not fake just use caution and make sure you truly understand the borrowed funds and also the terms, understanding that
    you ought to contain the cash.

Leave a Response