One Small Step for Photographers, One Giant Leap for Nikon’s Marketing Department

Nikon V1

by Miserere

  

If you just returned from a trip to the outer edge of the Milky Way, let me inform you that Nikon finally joined the compact mirrorless race with two cameras: The J1 and the more advanced V1, both using the same 10MP 13.2mm x 8.8mm CMOS sensor (that’s a 2.7x crop factor with respect to classic full frame). Many thought the Big Two (Nikon and Canon) were biding their time entering the mirrorless market but would do so with a bang when they did. Nobody knows what Canon has planned, if anything, but I’m here to tell you why I think Nikon’s release was more of a Fly’s Fart than a Big Bang.

Panasonic and Olympus have been slowly but surely improving their μ4/3 concept, offering cameras with and without an EVF (or with a detachable EVF if you want it that way), different sizes and prices, for a combined total of 5 or 6 different models. Their stable of lenses is growing, offering mostly slow consumer zooms to begin with, but now that Olympus has released its high quality, fast 12mm f/2 and 45mm f/1.8 primes, and Panasonic is finally shipping its cobranded with Leica 25mm f/1.4 (all to great reviews and applause, I should say), and seems poised to release two fast zooms, the system is reaching the point where it could replace a DSLR in many photographers’ kits. This makes sense to me, and it might make sense to you, but it makes no sense whatsoever to the folks at Nikon. You see, Panasonic has no DSLR system, and Olympus’s 4/3 DSLR system had reached maturity (according to Olympus’s bosses, anyway), so they were looking to create a camera system that would stand on its own and appeal to advanced photographers (although slimmed down models in cute colours being sold to novices and the ladies always help the bottom line and should not be neglected). Nikon, on the other hand, has a DSLR line to sell and introducing a product that would compete with its entry-level D3100 would be unacceptable, Nikon shooters be damned.

Sensor Size Areas

Courtesy of Nikon Rumors.

Is this a conspiracy theory? I think not. The smoking gun was found in this Nikon Rumors post where a reader plotted the area of the major sensor sizes at regular steps from the smallest 1/2.5″ to the Pentax 645D’s medium format (see graph to the right). Nikon’s J1/V1 sensor falls smack into the middle of the gap between 1/1.7″ sensor (used in advanced P&S cameras such as the Canon S95 or Olympus XZ-1) and μ4/3 sensor. This showcases a typical marketing thought pattern: If you can’t compete, create your own game. By being the only company with a sensor this size, and giving the format the name of Nikon CX (versus DX for APS-C and FX for full frame), it can position itself in a camera tier all of its own. Only a big company with brand recognition would try to pull this shit off, and by flooding the large electronics stores with these cameras, they will probably succeed.

But it’s not really the sensor size that places this camera in the beginners’ category, no; it’s the slow lenses, the colours, the lack of direct controls for many basic functions, the lack of a PASM mode dial (!!!), and the emphasis on non-technical, “power” words. Read the press release; in the first paragraph alone I caught the following stinkers: revolutionary, empower, driven, imaginative, iconic, lifestyle, unique, amazing. Marketing hype at its finest, substance at its lowest.

“This camera was not designed with the heart, it was designed with the shareholders’ pockets in mind.”

OK, OK, so Nikon’s marketing and sales department saw an opening and decided to increase their profits; what’s wrong with that? As a capitalist businessman, I see nothing wrong with it; as a photographer, I see Nikon just sold its photography soul and I mourn for its loss. This camera was not designed with the heart, it was designed with the shareholders’ pockets in mind.

But maybe Nikon might do like Sony and release an advanced version next year, I hear you say. Sure, Nikon, go ahead, because we all want another sensor format; it’s what the market has been clamouring for. Not. Unlike Sony, who was brave enough to offer an advanced compact such as the NEX-7 alongside its DSLR line, Nikon didn’t want to cannibalise its DX DSLR sales by offering a camera with similar specs, only smaller and lighter because of the lack of mirror and pentamirror, even if such a camera is what many people buying a D3100 would actually prefer. I doubt there will be a Nikon Pro 1, but if there is, they will still have missed their chance to wow the market and will be competing with advanced iterations of current mirrorless models from other brands, not to mention the lenses these other brands will have available by then. And with a 2.7x crop, the Nikon 1 system will not attract the adaptor fanatics flocking to the NEX cameras and their 1.5x crop factor.

The way I see it, Nikon had an opportunity here to create a true “iconic”, “unique” and “revolutionary” camera. Using its size and decades-long knowledge, they could have created the mirrorless camera that enthusiasts and advanced photographers have been waiting years for: An APS-C sensor, an EVF (on the left of the camera body!), plentiful external controls, and small, fastish prime lenses. Fuji proved it could be done with the X100 and that it was what people wanted…except maybe for the fixed lens, though that hasn’t stopped the camera from being perpetually backordered. Sony saw what Fuji did, took note, and released the NEX-7 which, despite its large (and limited number of) lenses, is being stratospherically preordered. Olympus just released two metal, high quality, fast primes. There’s talk of a new Panasonic that would be more rangefinderish than the G3. Samsung delayed the announcement of its NX20 by 6 months, allegedly to make it competitive with the NEX-7; they’ve also revealed they’re developing an NX1, a camera to sit above the NX20 line and aimed at those who want more than the NX20 will offer; and let’s not forget the many primes in their lens lineup. In short, everyone seems to have finally started listening to us, the advanced amateurs, yet Nikon has put its fingers in its ears and is saying la la la la la la la. I, and many others from what I read on the forums, had always thought that if anyone could get this whole mirrorless camera system right, it was Nikon: They built rangefinders in the past, they extract great IQ out of Sony APS-C sensors, they have a large R&D budget, excellent engineers…but it all came to nothing because the engineers and photographers at Nikon got bullied and pushed over by the marketing department.

RIP Nikon’s photography soul.

As for me, I’m awaiting the Samsung NX20, to be announced in a few weeks. Not only are Samsung’s ergonomics the best in the mirrorless segment (that’s my opinion, of course), they offer the most attractive line of fastish, pancake primes in the business, and their lens roadmap promises even more nice, fast glass in the near future. Then again, maybe Fuji will surprise us with an interchangeable version of the X100. At least that would be a pleasant surprise. Take note, Nikon!

Good light and good luck,

    —Miserere

  

Addendum
In case someone needs clarification: I am not saying the Nikon 1 cameras are rubbish; in fact, from the sample images I’ve seen online and some comparisons to other cameras, it looks like the J1/V1 might provide almost as good IQ as some μ4/3 cameras (though certainly not better than Sony NEX or Fuji X100), and it’s obviously better IQ than a P&S. That’s good! However, the cameras are not aimed at advanced amateurs, they are aimed at the mythical P&S movers-uppers, hipsters, soccer-mums and Ashton Kutcher’s 9 million Twitter followers. That’s what pisses me off. I seriously thought Nikon would understand that there are a gazillion (approximate number) photographers who want DSLR quality in a smaller package, with external controls and with a stable of small, high quality primes. The IQ of the Nikon 1 is irrelevant to me given how it’s packaged, and it will also be irrelevant to those who will flock to μ4/3 after this announcement. I can imagine the guys at Olympus and Panasonic threw a huge party on September 21 as they sighed a sigh of relief knowing they wouldn’t have to compete with Nikon in the mirrorless market. Mike Johnston said it best when he wrote: It was a couple of Nikons that arrived [...] But somehow it seemed like what really arrived was Micro 4/3. Exactly.

Related posts:

  1. One Step Closer to a Modular Digital Camera: The Ricoh GXR
  2. Shooting Macros Section 2 – The Small World
  3. More Small Cameras: Leica X1 Field Report at Luminous Landscape
  4. Police to Be Off-Limits to Photographers in the UK
  5. When Photographers Go to Court

If you enjoyed this article and found it useful, please consider buying us a beverage. Better still, support EtL by making your online purchases through our affiliate stores—it costs you nothing extra and we get a small commission from every item.
Note: Links in this article might be to one of our affiliate stores. Purchases made from our affiliates through these links will benefit Enticing the Light at no extra cost to you.


Tags: , , , ,

  

14 Comments

  1. I fail to see the idea behind a camera like this, although it’s not quite as stupid as the Pentax Q. What is the point of having a P&S camera with interchangable lenses? I think that most customers who are willing to change lenses and to have a camera system, do it for the better IQ. And while sensor technology advances and a small sensor today is much better than the same size sensor would have been before, anything below µ4/3 is a serious compromise in my opinion. Some people will probably buy a Q for its novelty value or a 1 for its novelty value and being a Nikon, but I suspect that this category will be forgotten soon.

  2. Speaking of NX20… where is the Conclusion of your NX10 report?

  3. What a great rant! It’s so hard to care about products that were designed by the marketing department. The announcement wouldn’t have been so laughable if it weren’t for all of the hyperbole about unprecedented advances in photography. I guess you’d have to be a pretty crappy marketer to send out a press release that said “This camera fills a gap in the market that you didn’t even know was there. It’s deliberately crippled to prevent buyer’s remorse for the Nikon DSLR owners!”

    Canon and Nikon have all but perfected the DSLR, but they seem to be at a loss as to where to go from here.

  4. Late is the hour that..

    Nikon is Late yes fourth/third a much laughed at system because it was more in between then anything you. It is very good though limited obviously but isn’t everything.

    Sony look at it and thought “Hey we can do that to” so they did. slightly bigger slightly more akward. But they are trying. [it won't beat Pentax Lenses yet.. that will takes years]

    So Nikon welcome I guess… why what no no seriously no. I rather buy a nice Pentax with a few nice high quality glass primes. Oooh pancake lenses!

    Even the 14-42mm is not bad. Very decent lens very decent system using yes a small form factor.

    But Nikon I agree with the article seriously is that what you are going to offer us? You are late very late.

  5. I think I read that Fuji has sold about 70,000 X100′s. Is that a number that would motivate Nikon at all?

  6. The Nikon 1 received nice numbers from the DXO labs in the sensor test, 54 and 56 . To most, not stellar, but when compared to 4/3′s and smaller it performed equal to or better. I was surprised when I saw the ratings considering my beloved Nikon D50 scored a 55, and I like the quality of my pictures a lot. The 1′s bit depth and dynamic range is good, but the iso noise numbers were not high ( very good for sensor size though ). Nikon is obviously on to something with 1 system. Out of the gate with a new mini me sensor and and good photo IQ is impressive.
    I think they will introduce a model with pro like controls after they have a good feel on where this intro lands. If improvements are to come down the road, I think they will be focusing on lower noise with higher iso speeds with more external controls. Isn’t the body construction a good start ?
    I do not know all of the camera’s out there and they’re physical dimensions, but, I don’t know of another camera the size of the Nikon 1 system that can replicate it’s photo quality and speed. I personally don’t need the latest, greatest, and smallest but I am impressed with this product thus far.

  7. Sold its soul?

    All consumer product companies create consumer products designed to render a profit. Not sure how a mass produced inanimate device has a soul to sell.

    But there are some assumptions here. That micro 4/3 was not created by companies with marketing departments who realized they could not play among the big boys without creating their own new proprietary format from whole cloth. And that somehow there is a divine right for micro 4/3, and anyone who chose to defy it is guilty of heresy.

    Nikon most definitely took a chance here. They didn’t want to play me-too, wanted to defend their brand, so are gambling on a very high-priced interchangeable lens compact system with some very advanced features. There’s absolutely no guarantee it will succeed- if anything, indications are to the contrary. But this is most definitely a gamble and not a safe shot.

  8. Ashton Kutcher -”huge is now small” a small actor, with small talent and a small d*** somehow became a huge success, now selling a small camera. The world really is messed up. Too bad a reasonably nice camera is associated with someone so “small”.

  9. I can’t quite work out why I hate this camera so much. I think it’s a combination of it technically being not far to a joke – such a large camera for such a tiny sensor, one would have hoped a Nikon mirrorless would be a “real” camera, rather than a consumers turd… perhaps Nikon are just too scared of shooting themselves in the foot with regard to dSLR sales? Then I guess the other thing is the fact that they’re pushing it so much with advertisements.

    Hate.

    • My theory still stands: They’re afraid to compromise their DSLR sales. The sacrificed making a great camera for that and, in the end, in the long run, have hurt themselves more than they know.

Trackbacks

  1. ¿A quien esta dirigida la nueva Nikon 1? | Fotografia Martin Silva

Leave a Response